This contains research articles published by lecturers in the department of Accounting

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://repository.nileuniversity.edu.ng/handle/123456789/103

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Managerial discretions and loan loss provisions in Nigerian banks
    (Central European Review Of Economics And Management, 2022-02-02) Abdulai Agbaje Salami; Uthman Ahmad Bukola; Ruth Oluwayemisi Owoade
    Aim: The high level of non-performing exposures and the existing crisis in the Nigerian banking sector is a source of concern. To create a basis for solving the troubles caused by the loan loss crisis, this study investigated the managerial discretionary use of loan loss provisions (LLPs) by Nigerian deposit money banks (DMBs). This is considered in the context of solvency risk and reforms embedded in the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). Design/research methods: Datasets related to the variables of the study were hand-collected from annual reports of a sample of 16 Nigerian deposit money banks over the period of 2007-2017. The analyses were performed using principal components analysis to derive the managerial discretions index (MDI), Prais-Winsten ordinary least square regression to segregate LLP into reported LLPs (TLLP) and discretionary LLPs (DLLP) and appropriate panel data regression models to test the study’s hypotheses subsequent to series of diagnostic tests. Conclusions/findings:The results revealed that managerial discretions negatively influence TLLP and DLLP represented by absolute value of DLLP (ADLLP). This represents an increase in profitability without manipulatingloan loss provisions. However, the reforms embedded in IFRSs revealed the use of LLPs for managerial discretions despite reduction in provisioning level noticeable during IFRS. The situation of Nigerian banks threatened by solvency risk use of LLPs for managerial discretions while attempting to increase profit was exemplified in the increase in ADLLP rather than TLLP. However, improvement was noticeable for risky Nigerian banks during IFRS. The managerial discretionary use of LLPs especially during IFRS was engendered by use of LLPs for capital management and earnings smoothing rather than earnings signalling as further revealed. This shows that adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards reduces reporting quality of Nigerian banks in their loan loss decisions.
  • Item
    Signalling behaviour and bank provisioning policies in Nigeria
    (Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, Brno, 2021-02-02) Salami, Adbulai Agbaje; Uthman Ahmad Bukola; Abdulrauf, Lukman Adebayo-Oke
    Purpose of the article: Based on the propositions of the signalling hypothesis and prospect theory, this study examined the extent of attempt by Nigerian deposit money banks (DMBs) to solve the issue of adverse selection via signalling their financial prospects using loan loss provisions (LLPs). The empirical test was subject to the DMBs’ riskiness and changes in the accounting rule given failure of a number DMBs and the adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) respectively in Nigeria in the recent past. Methodology: Bank-level unbalanced panel datasets of a sample 16 DMBs, which are related to the variables of the study, were hand-extracted from their annual reports and account between 2007 and 2017. The analysis was conducted using the Prais-Winsten regression correlated with panel corrected standard errors (PCSE-PW) owing to the presence of heteroscedastic and autocorrelated residuals in the study’s regression models. Scientific aim: The study examined the relationship between LLPs and one-year-ahead changes in earnings before taxes and LLPs to establish whether Nigerian DMBs signal their financial strength via LLPs. Findings: The study largely found that Nigerian DMBs, regardless of accounting regime and risk of insolvency, do not use LLPs to signal their financial strength. However, where the evidence of signalling via LLPs was evident the coefficient of earnings signalling was insignificant, where it was significant signalling was achievable via discretionary LLPs (DLLP) rather than actual LLPs (TLLP) suggesting manipulative provisioning in the use of LLPs to signal. Conclusions: The study’s findings included empirical communication alerts to the regulators and Nigerian DMBs on the need for improvement in earnings signalling, as the present scenario may be interpreted as a sign of a non-going concern by analytical stakeholders. Limits of research: The generalisation of the study’s findings may be limited by the focus on one regime (IAS 39) of IFRS loan loss reporting but mitigated by the partial implementation of the second regime (IFRS 9) for the first four years in the country.
  • Item
    Bank Funding Strategy and Income Smoothing Practices in Nigeria
    (Global Journal of Accounting, 2022-02-02) Abdulai Agbaje Salami; Uthman Ahmad Bukola; Rahji Ohize Ibrahim; Kamaldeen Ibraheem Nageri
    The regulators’ provision of bailouts to troubled banks accentuates the connection between level of funding and bank financial condition. This scenario has been characteristic of Nigerian deposit money banks (DMBs) in the last decade and followed by a number of reforms including adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). This prompted the study’s examination of nexus between bank funding strategy and income smoothing practices achievable via adjustments to loan loss provisions (LLPs) considering IFRSs adoption and solvency risk. Bank-level unbalanced panel data were hand-extracted from the annual reports of a sample of 16 DMBs for the period 2007-2017. Data were analyzed using appropriate panel regression model subsequent to derivation of discretionary provision for loan losses (DPL) used to measure income smoothing and index of funding strategy (FSI) as a measure of overall funding strategy. The results showed that bank funding drive prompts Nigerian DMBs’ income smoothing practices via DPL regardless of their solvency status and reflects majorly in their motive for external financing, deposit and non-deposit funding other than internal funding strategy. However, reduction was noticeable during IFRS given the observed inverse relationship between funding strategy and Nigerian DMBs’ income smoothing practices. Despite improved financial reporting quality during IFRS, the mixed results obtained in the funding strategy-DPL nexus of Nigerian DMBs threatened by risk of insolvency call for increased level of oversights and additional reforms by the regulators. The need for regulators to re-sharpen their supervisory tools as Nigerian DMBs switch from IAS 39 to more discretions-inclined IFRS 9 for loan loss reporting was also advocated. This study is unique for derivation of FSI and joint test of IFRS-solvency risk moderating influence.
  • Item
    Bank capital, earnings smoothing and provisioning practices in Nigeria
    (Emerald, 2024-02-02) Abdulai Agbaje Salami; Uthman Ahmad Bukola
    Purpose – This study empirically tests the use of loan loss provisions (LLPs) for earnings and capital smoothing when emphasis is laid on banks’ riskiness and adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) in Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach – Annual bank-level data are hand-extracted between 2007 and 2017 from annual reports of a sample 16 deposit money banks (DMBs), and analysed using appropriate panel regression models subsequent to a number of diagnostic tests including heteroscedasticity, autocorrelation and cross sectional dependence. The use of both reported LLPs (TLLP) and discretionary LLPs (DLLP) for earnings and capital management is tested to advance the practice in the literature. Findings – Generally, the study finds that Nigerian DMBs manage capital via LLPs, while mixed results are obtained for earnings smoothing. However, during IFRS, Nigerian DMBs’ management of capital is identifiable with TLLP, while smoothing of earnings is peculiar to DLLP. Additionally, evidence of the improvement in loan loss reporting quality expected during IFRS for riskier Nigerian DMBs, could not be attained. This is corroborated by the study’s findings of the use of both TLLP and DLLP for earnings and capital management during IFRS by DMBs in solvency crisis against the only use of TLLP to manage capital found for the entire period. Practical implications – The evidential capital and earnings lopsidedness may subject Nigerian DMBs’ going-concern to a lot of questions. Originality/value – The study sets a foremost record in the empirical test of managerial opportunistic behaviour embedded in earnings and capital concurrently while accounting for loan losses by all categories of Nigerian DMBs in terms of riskiness, following accounting regime change.