Adekunle Akanni AdelekePeter Pelumi IkubanniAyokunle O. BalogunJude A. OkolieChiebuka T. ChristopherAyobami O. OlawaleJoseph C. Okonkwo2025-02-102022-02-02Adeleke, A.A. et.al. (2022). Comparative Analyses of Lean Grade Coal and Carbonized Antiaris toxicaria for Energy Generation. Petroleum and Coal1337-7027https://repository.nileuniversity.edu.ng/handle/123456789/339The current study focused on characterizing lean grade coal and carbonized biomass (at 400oC) for energy generation. Samples were pulverized using a ball mill and then mixed with a mechanical mixer at two mixing ratios. Proximate, ultimate and calorific value analyses were carried out on the samples using different ASTM standards and some available linear regression models. Lean grade coal has the highest ash content (79.58%) while raw biomass has the least (2.29%). Carbonized biomass samples have the highest heating value (9.49 MJ/kg). The O/C and H/C atomic ratios shows that carbonized biomass is the best fuel compared to coal and blended samples. The FTIR spectra of coal and blended samples shows peaks representing Si-O-Si while C-H bonds were the predominant ones in raw and carbonized samples. Lean grade coal and blended samples contain silicon as displayed by the EDX spectra. The coal and blended samples have grey-like silica and carbide microstructure. The coal and blended samples are not good for energy generation but may serve well as raw material for silicon recovery. Carbonized biomass has good fuel properties that can be useful in existing coal-fired plants.enLean grade coalAntiaris toxicariaCarbonizationFTIR spectroscopyEnergy.Comparative Analyses of Lean Grade Coal and Carbonized Antiaris toxicaria for Energy GenerationArticle